Thursday, 11 December 2008

What can we do as individuals?

Sustainability is something anybody and everybody can be involved with. But do people really live sustainable lives? And if not, what can they do to improve this?
Being sustainable can be simple. For example, just by turning off a light as you walk out of the room is being sustainable. What else could people do? Things such as switching the TV off at the wall rather than leaving it on standby, turning the washing machine temperature down by a few degrees, and re-using bags when you go shopping rather than using new ones. These simple acts of sustainability will only make a difference if lots of people.
Recycling is being increasingly advertised in todays social circles, and is becoming a part of everyday life for people. This is a good thing as recycled material can be used more and more instead of producing and using new materials. Local councils are making it easier and easier to recycle, providing bins which are collected fortnightly.

As already stated, people are also being told to re-use as well as recycle, such as re-using a plastic back at the supermarket.

Another slightly more effective way of being sustainable is your choice of transport. Owning a car is almost the normal for people now, but owning a large un-economical 4x4 in the middle of a large town or city is not a good idea. Owning a smaller car will not only help with saving money (obviously but not using as much fuel) but will help the environment as they produce less CO2 emissions.



Another way for people to lead a sustainable life is to research their energy provider to find the most sustainable one. Eon for example use wind as an energy source, so the user will have much less CO2 emmisions. Alternativly homes can be fitted with their own wind turbine.

So, as shown, there are a lot of ways for people to become sustainable, i have named but a few. The main point here though is the fact that no one individual can only help the environment, but if hundreds of thousands of people start and continue, we will start to see a change.

Thursday, 20 November 2008

United Nations Debate

Well, we had a UN style debate last week. We got put into pairs and each pair represented a country. Me and Rachael had to represent Belize.


So what did I learn from this exercise? Well firstly, i'm ashamed to admit, I didn't know where Belize was! But fear not, I know now: it lies between Mexico and Guatemala on the Caribbean coast of Northern Central America. As for the sustainable developments put in place in the Country at the moment? Well, there really isn't much they are doing! Compared to other countries in used in the debate I can see why Belize didn't get the money. It's main source of income is tourism so the main connection with sustainable development is Eco-tourism. Not at the top of the UN list of things to do!I enjoyed listening to the debate, although my input was very limited. I know how difficult it was infront of a group of people i knew, I dread to think what must be going through the minds of our UN representatives at the UN debates! I liked learning about strategies put in place by countries I had never given thought to before (The Solomon Islands for example). It showed me that a lot of well developed countries are not being very sustainable, where as a lot of undeveloped countries are trying their best, and using what resources they have, to become as sustainable as possible. This is because developed countries, such as the USA, have so much money and power that they don't need to worry about using unrenewable materials such as oil. Whereas smaller, less developed countries, such as Ghana, haven't got as much money and so can not afford to use as much oil and unrenewable materials.

I also noticed how wide spread the topics talked about were. From the likes of the USA mentioning gun crime and drugs, and other countries mentioning pollutuion or nearly extinct anilmals. The subject of sustainability appears to have completley different meanings to different people.

Overall I feel the debate went well. I learned a lot about other countries and their strategies for sustainable development. If I was to do it again, I would try and research more in depth, I would try and contact the countries government and ask them personally what their strategies are, how they are developing, and try to understand a bit more from their point of view.

Thursday, 6 November 2008

Recycling in Northampton

The Northamptonshire Government recently published a " Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy" The 2008 edition is an adopted version of the 2002 copy.


Since 2002 the percentatage increase of recycling happening in Northamptonshire has incresed from 14% to 34%. They want to increse this figure to 36% by 2010 and to 50% by 2020. This means that HALF the waste in a household will be recycling. Compare this to other authorities such as South Norfolk County Council who have a stategy but no target figures and it is a good target, however considering Northamptonshire almost doubled the amount of recycling in two years (from 18% to 28% from 2002-2004) the target of 50% seems less than satisfactory.


A number of questions appear, such as: Have the Northamptonshire Waste Partnership (NWP) thought about telling people to recycle, not only paper, plastics, and glass, but materials such as food and cotton which can be composted? Could the authorities pair up with other companies and recycle other household objects such as mobile phones or ink cartridges? Is there a reward system in place, such as getting paid in return for a certain percentage of recycling per household? There are many more recycling ideas all over the internet, why doesn't the NWP create a "best of" list, with ideas people would find most helpful, for those that haven't looked online.Northampton Borough Council currently collect two bins of recycling: a green one for paper and cardboard and a blue one for plastic, cans and foil. They also collect household waste in a black bin and have a brown bin at some houses for garden waste. Why do they not collect glass? Well they are just about to introduce it after a very succesful trial at the end of Sept 2008, which collected 100 tonnes of glass in five months.


Compared to many other authorities Northamptonshire is doing very well with targets, but this doesn't mean they can't improve. By collecting glass they could increase the amount collected for recycling dramatically. It is good that they have started to collect garden waste, but out of 660,000 homes only 60,000 have garden waste collected. That's less than under 10%! Glass, like the garden waste, is only being done to a small percentage of households (Just 86,000)

Recycling is a major part of British life at the moment, with supermarkets rewarding you for re-using your own shopping bags, charging you for using plastic bags, and some authorities giving out rewards for recycling correctly. If enough people sre given the motivation to start and continue, recycling figures could be dramatically changed for the better.

Further Reading:

Northamptonshire Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy

Reduce Reuse Recycle

A different way of reusing

Recycle.com

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

The media: Should it be trusted?

The question "how realiable is the media" leads to an ongoing discussion. Newspapers round up figures and over exaggerate headlines because “bad news sells papers”. There are two main types of newspaper: Broadsheet (such as The Guardian) or Tabloid (such as The Sun).

Tabloids and Broadsheets used to be easily distinguishable, but recently broadsheets have become much more like tabloids (the most obvious difference being colour photos). Even though there is a cloud around the media at the moment some surveys show that the public trust what they here in the news more than they trust their own government!

Another difference between tabloids and broadsheets is how they present news. Whereas a broadsheet would take a subject like climate change seriously with giving us data, figures and information, a tabloid paper links into celebs and gossip (in this case a well known supermarket).This is because (generally) readers of tabloids like to be told about subjects close to there lives whereas broadsheet readers like to learn bits of new information. When talking about the environment in general, The Guardian Online has a very large section devoted to the it, whereas The Sun only has major stories relating to the environment.

Broadsheets have even started reporting about how tabloids report things such as climate change with "only 1.8% of tabloid coverage written by specialist correspondents".

Recently though with news such as the credit crunch and subjects that effect our lives in the short term have taken over the newspapers, both in the broadsheet and tabloid.

The decrease of related stories could be due to one of two reasons:

1) The total number of stories has increased, with the same number, or more, related to climate change or,

2) Simply the number has decreased

Could this mean that the media is losing interest in the subject and concentrating on present topics, or could this mean that the public is losing interest in the subject and the media is just trying to satisfy the publics needs?

The irony with newspapers is that no matter how much they report, discuss or try to teach people about climate change or sustainability, all the major newspapers are printed on unsustainable, unrecycled paper. That's why all of the major newspaper companies, and the majority of the smaller companies, now publish online articles (but surely they can't be called newsPAPERs anymore!?). Which leads to a problem: where does the electricity to power the computers come from? would it be more sustainable to print newspapers and turn off computers, or stop printing newspapers and use the computers?

Further Reading:

C4 accused of falsifying data in documentary on climate change

Media attacked for 'climate porn'

Climate change hits Mars

Alex Lockwood

Encyclopedia of Sustainable Development

Tuesday, 14 October 2008

The Uncertain Future Of Cars

Since petrol prices reached an all time high, the media and the government have taken it upon themselves to give hints and tips on how to save money during the recession by advising people to drive less, get a small car rather than a Chelsea tractor, or use public transport.

But realistically, this is not going to happen until decent, reliable public transport that goes where you want, when you want, is available. It is also unlikely that people will drive less because they want, like, and even need, to drive based on any number of factors. Based on my personal experience, living nowhere near a town and with only one bus a day, I need a car to do everything. People are now also choosing their cars to beat the taxes now being enforced. A car that emits less CO2 gets taxed less than one that produces more, and therefore is cheaper to run. As a result of this it lands on the car companies to do something, in order to become more profitable.

It is now almost a competition to get the highest MPG (miles per gallon) from a larger engine. For a normal engine, cars average around 40MPG, but some can reach 130MPG. As an aside, the world record for the highest MPG was recently broken when a team reached an incredible 12,666MPG!

But there is only so much you can get from a petrol or diesel engine, which explains the recent world record - the engine used ran on hydrogen, and wasn’t a road car. Therefore alternative fuels are being increasingly used.

Each car manufacturer has its own vision for the future of cars, be it hybrid, bio-diesel, hydrogen, bio-ethanol, electric or even water.

Bio-ethanol is a relatively new fuel, comprising of 85% ethanol alcohol and 15% petrol. It gives excellent results from the engine, with some sports cars using it already. The Lotus Exige 265E is able to run on anything from 100% petrol to the 15% petrol Bio-ethanol and still have the same amazing performance.

Several other major breakthroughs have recently happened regarding alternate fuels, including the new Honda FCX, which has an electric motor that throws out no emissions, except water.
And finally the Genepax, a car that runs on nothing but Water, "river rain or sea… even tea works"! Just one litre of water will keep the car running at 80kmh (just under 50mph) for more than one hour.


So, the possibilities are endless, it seems. I just wonder, when will a car be designed that runs on nothing but oxygen?

Further Reading:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/2312521.stm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bloom/actions/cookingoil.shtml

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/oct/09/martinwainwright

http://world.honda.com/FuelCell/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/show/episodes/series10episode9.shtml

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dpf3C2EReVo

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0801/csmimg/p12b_popup.gif